Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Labor Studies Journal
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dearman, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Computerized Social Casework Recording: Autonomy and Control in Australia's Income Support Agency

Philip Dearman

This paper reports on a case study of the computerization of social work recording. The context is a large and geographically dispersed social work service that forms part of Australia's income support network, Centrelink. The study is part of a larger research project charting the effects of computerized recording on the autonomy—or sense of independence, and freedom of action—of social workers. The paper summarizes interviews with workers who responded to questions about a management information system they use to record their work, and that managers use to monitor and control certain aspects of that work. Interviewees were asked to talk about the development and implemen tation of the system, and to comment on their expectations and their feelings about the outcomes. Responses indicate a sense of frustration with a system used to monitor but not effectively regulate workloads. While computerization holds out the prospect of making procedures more rational—in the name of the imagined paperless office—it seems to have swamped these workers with new workload burdens that are difficult to escape, and to have standardized elements of judgment and decision making, leaving caseworkers with a substantially differ ent sense of autonomy.

Labor Studies Journal, Vol. 30, No. 1, 47-65 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0160449X0503000104


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J Soc WorkHome page
J. Burton and D. van den Broek
Accountable and Countable: Information Management Systems and the Bureaucratization of Social Work
Br. J. Soc. Work, October 1, 2009; 39(7): 1326 - 1342.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]