Labor Studies Journal

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Feldman, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Labor Studies Journal, Vol. 32, No. 2, 125-141 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0160449X07299727

Putting Uncle Milton to Bed

Reexamining Milton Friedman's Essay on the Social Responsibility of Business

Glenn Feldman

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Almost four decades ago Nobel prize-winning economist Milton Friedman published an essay on the social responsibility of business in the New York Times Magazine that has since reached legendary status. Friedman's argument—that essentially firms had no social responsibility beyond making profits—was not unknown among fellow pioneers of what has become known as neoliberalism, the "Chicago School," or Austrian economics. Yet while the thesis was known to those specialists familiar with the work of F. A. Hayek or Ludwig von Mises, Friedman's exposition did much to popularize what had previously and largely been considered a form of rightist economic extremism. After three decades of actual neoliberal experimentation in Washington and London, the present essay looks again at what Friedman wrote. This essay finds Friedman's work to be profoundly unpersuasive—indeed much of it illogical, sophistic, and potentially foundational for a form of economic and social callousness.

Key Words: reexamination of Milton Friedman • social responsibility of business • neoliberalism • rightest economic extremism • Chicago School • Austrian School of economics


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?