Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Labor Studies Journal
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, N. E.
Right arrow Articles by Meshquat Uddin, A.N.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Impact of Delay on Arbitrators' Decisions in Discharge Cases

Nels E. Nelson

Department of Management and Labor Relations at Cleveland State University, Cleveland, Ohio 44115

A.N.M. Meshquat Uddin

Management, School of Business, 12 Kemal Ataturk Avenue, North South University, Banani, Dhaka 1213, Bangladesh

This study suggests that there is a more important reason for con cern about delay in the arbitration of discharge cases than the hardship it creates for the discharged employee or the problem presented to the employer by the potential of a large backpay award. It hypothesizes that the status quo tendency in decision making means the longer the delay between an employee's discharge and the arbitrator's decision, the less likely the grievant is to be reinstated. A test of this hypothesis using logistic regression indicates that, after controlling for other factors, a one- month increase in the delay reduces the odds of reinstatement by 8.6 percent.

Key Words: Index Terms: Arbitration • decision analysis/Discharge and discipline/ Grievance representation

Labor Studies Journal, Vol. 23, No. 2, 3-20 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/0160449X9802300201


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Labor Studies JournalHome page
B. Nissen
Would the Employee Free Choice Act Effectively Protect the Right to Unionize?: Evidence from a South Florida Nursing Home Case
Labor Studies Journal, March 1, 2009; 34(1): 65 - 90.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management Communication QuarterlyHome page
J. M. Morgan, C. M. Reynolds, T. J. Nelson, A. R. Johanningmeier, M. Griffin, and P. Andrade
Tales from the Fields: Sources of Employee Identification in Agribusiness
Management Communication Quarterly, February 1, 2004; 17(3): 360 - 395.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Labor Studies JournalHome page
J. Hennen
E. T. Weir, Employee Representation, and the Dimensions of Social Control: Weirton Steel. 1933-1937
Labor Studies Journal, September 1, 2001; 26(3): 25 - 49.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Labor Studies JournalHome page
B. Nissen
Building a "Minority Union": The CWA Experience at NCR
Labor Studies Journal, January 1, 2001; 25(4): 34 - 55.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Crit SociolHome page
B. Nissen
Review Essay: The Remarkable Rehabilitation of Company Unionism in Recent Industrial Relations Literature
Crit Sociol, January 1, 1999; 25(1): 59 - 79.
[Abstract] [PDF]